A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Information Booklet on

Knowledge regarding Coronary Angiography among 3rd Year G.N.M. students in selected Nursing School at Vijayapur, Karnataka

 

Shaikh Azhar Haroon

PhD Nursing Scholar, Shri JJTU University, Rajasthan, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: azharcares4u@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Coronary heart disease contributes much to the burden morbidity and mortality from chronic diseases globally and more than 80% of CVD-related deaths worldwide now occur in low and middle income countries. In India about 30 million adults suffer from cardiovascular disease. Objectives: To assess the knowledge of 3rd year G.N.M. students regarding coronary angiography and evaluate the effectiveness of informational booklet on knowledge regarding coronary angiography. Method: Pre-experimental research design was used for the study. Information booklet is dependent variable and knowledge of student nurses regarding coronary angiography is dependent variable. The setting of the study is at selected Schools of nursing at Vijayapur, Karnataka. Simple random sampling technique is used to select the subjects. The sample size is of 60 students. Result: In pre-test majority of subjects 30 (50%) had an average knowledge; 18 (30%) had poor knowledge and 12 (20%) had good knowledge, where as in post-test 51 (85%) of them had good knowledge and 09 (15%) had poor knowledge. Study also reveals that there is no association between pre-test knowledge and selected Socio demographic variables. Study also reveals that calculated paired‘t’ value (t= 26.48) is greater than tabulated value (t= 1.960). Hence H1 is accepted. This indicates that the gain in knowledge score is statistically significant at P< 0.05 levels. Conclusion: The findings of the study conclude that there is a need for educating the student nurses regarding coronary angiography. It implies that a nursing administrator should take part in developing protocols, standing orders related to design of the educational programmes and strategies for GNM Students regarding Coronary angiography.

 

KEYWORDS: Evaluate, effectiveness, information booklet, coronary angiography, 3rd year GNM students

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Coronary angiography was first performed in 1929 when the German physician Werner Forssmann inserted a plastic tube in his cubital vein and guided it to the right chamber of the heart. He took an x-ray to prove his success and published it on November 5, 1929 with the title "Über die Sondierung des rechten Herzens" (About probing of the right heart).1

 

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the major cause of mortality globally, as well as in India. They are caused by disorders of the heart and blood vessels, and includes coronary heart disease (heart attacks), cerebrovascular disease (stroke), raised blood pressure (hypertension), peripheral artery disease, rheumatic heart disease, congenital heart disease and heart failure.2

 

Coronary heart disease contributes much to the burden morbidity and mortality from chronic diseases globally and more than 80% of CVD-related deaths worldwide now occur in low and middle income countries.

 

Incidence and prevalence of coronary artery disease and stroke account for at least 13.2 million deaths in world every year which is obtained by following statistics: Over 50,000 American die due to cardiovascular disease each year. One in five women has some form of heart or blood vessel disease. Over 2 million Europeans die due to coronary artery disease each year. An estimated 21% of European men and 22% of European women die from coronary artery disease.3

 

In India about 30 million adults suffer from cardiovascular disease. The WHO estimates that 60% of the world’s cardiac patient’s age between 30-65 year will be in India by 2010. Statistics shows that in the year 2003-2006 top sites in India saw over 100,000 patients (Bangalore 3 sites) and male and female incidence about ratio 253 male and 204 female per 100,000 in 2000 and will be projected 295male and 239 female in 2015.The number of coronary incidences in India are increasing by 25% every year. In north India it is 16% higher than south India. Report shows that overall prevalence of coronary artery disease in south India was 74%.4 A report of 2014 showed 1,03,000 bypass surgeries were carried out in Karnataka. In India Cardiovascular mortality raised by 103 % in men and 110 % in women during the period of 1985 -2015 and the cardiovascular disease will be the greatest killer by the year 2020.According to a study published in the Lancet, projections indicate that by 2030 NCDs will account for almost 75% of all deaths in India and the years of life lost due to coronary heart disease will be greater in that country than in China, the Russian Federation and the United States of America combined.3

 

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have now become the leading cause of mortality in India. A quarter of all mortality is attributable to CVD. Ischemic heart disease and stroke are the predominant causes and are responsible for>80% of CVD deaths. The Global Burden of Disease study estimate of age-standardized CVD death rate of 272 per 100 000 population in India is higher than the global average of 235 per 100 000 population. Some aspects of the CVD epidemic in India are particular causes of concern, including its accelerated buildup, the early age of disease onset in the population, and the high case fatality rate. In India, the epidemiological transition from predominantly infectious disease conditions to non-communicable diseases has occurred over a rather brief period of time. Premature mortality in terms of years of life lost because of CVD in India increased by 59%, from 23.2 million (1990) to 37 million (2010). Despite wide heterogeneity in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors across different regions, CVD has emerged as the leading cause of death in all parts of India, including poorer states and rural areas.5

 

A cross sectional study was conducted at Shirur, Karnataka a rural field practice area of S. Nijalingappa Medical College, Bagalkot between 1st January 2014 to 31st October 2015, to study the prevalence of CHD among individuals aged 20 years and above. The systematic random sampling method was used to draw the sample of 1226 respondents from 7015 eligible individuals. The present study was revealed the prevalence of CHD as 7.58% with the prevalence of symptomatic CHD (4.81%) was higher compared to asymptomatic (2.77%) cases. CHD was found to be significantly associated with increasing age in both genders (p<0.001) with male (60.22%) predominance. Higher prevalence of CHD was found among Hindu individuals, married people, illiterate and also among the individuals belonging to lower socio economic class. The study was concluded that, higher prevalence of CHD was found in the study in Shirur; a village of North Karnataka is a matter of concern. The study was recommended that regular screening and health education regarding the risk factors and lifestyle modification is needed.6

 

OBJECTIVES:

1.     To assess the knowledge of 3rd year G.N.M. students regarding coronary angiography.

2.     To evaluate the effectiveness of informational booklet on knowledge regarding coronary angiography.

3.     To develop informational booklet regarding coronary angiography for student nurses.

4.     To find the association between the knowledge scores with selected Socio demographic variables.

 

METHODOLOGY:

The research design used for this study is pre experimental (1 group pre-test and post-test) design. The independent variable is the Information booklet and the dependent variable is knowledge of the student nurses regarding coronary angiography. The setting of the study is at selected Schools of nursing at Vijayapur, Karnataka. Simple random sampling technique is used to select the subjects. The sample size is of 60 students. The tool used for the study is self-administered knowledge Questionnaire to assess the knowledge of the student nurses on coronary angiography. Content validity of the tool is given by experts and tool is found to be reliable and feasible. IB is prepared to enhance the knowledge about Coronary angiography among the student nurses and is validated by the experts before administration. The main study was conducted for six weeks in selected Schools of Nursing at Vijayapur. Pre-test was done to the student nurses of both the genders. After the pre-test, IB was administered, on 8th day, and administered post-test and assessed their knowledge on coronary angiography.

 

RESULTS:

Section 1: Demographic variables of nurses:

In pre-test majority of subjects 30 (50%) had an average knowledge; 18 (30%) had poor knowledge and 12 (20%) had good knowledge, where as in post-test 51 (85%) of them had good knowledge and 09 (15%) had poor knowledge.

 

PRESENTATION OF DATA:

The data presented under the following sections:

Section I: Analysis and interpretation of sociodemographic data of subjects.

Section II: Analysis and interpretation of knowledge scores of subjects regarding coronary angiography.

Section III: Testing hypotheses for evaluation of Effectiveness of informational booklet

Section IV: Analysis and interpretation of data to find out association between the pre-test knowledge scores with selected sociodemographic variables.

 

Section I: Analysis and interpretation of socio- demographic data of subjects.

 

Table 1: Frequency distribution of subjects according to their socio-demographic data             n = 60

S. No.

Socio demographic variables

Frequency (f)

%

01

Age (in yrs)

a)      20-24

b)     25-29

c)      30 and above

 

30

24

06

 

50%

40%

10%

02

Gender

a)      Male

b)     Female

 

24

36

 

40%

60%

03

Religion

a)      Hindu

b)     Muslim

c)      Christian

d)     Others

 

36

18

06

00

 

60%

30%

10%

00

04

Type of family

a)      Nuclear

b)     Joint

c)      Extended

 

34

20

06

 

56.66%

33.33%

10%

05

Place of Residence

a)      Rural

b)     Semi Urban

c)      Urban

 

12

30

18

 

20%

50%

30%

06

Source of information

a)      Mass media

b)     Self reading

c)      Family / friends

d)     Others

 

30

18

12

00

 

50%

30%

20%

00

 

Section 2: Mean, Median, Mode, Standard Deviation, and Range of knowledge score of subjects regarding Coronary Angiography.

 

Table 2: Pre-test and post-test percentage of knowledge scores of subjects in items of Coronary Angiography           n=60

Area of analysis

Mean

Median

Mode

S.D

Range

Pre-test(x)

12

13

14

2.68

10

Post-test(y)

25

26

26

2.92

8

Difference(y-x)

13

13

12

0.24

2

Section 3: Frequency and percentage distribution of knowledge scores of subjects regarding Coronary angiography.

 

Table 3: Mean, Median, Mode, Standard Deviation, and Range of knowledge score of subjects regarding Coronary Angiography

                                                                                           n= 60

Knowledge score

Pre test Freq %

Post test Freq %

Good

12

20

51

85

Average

30

50

09

15

Poor

18

30

00

00

 

Section 4: Testing hypothesis for evaluation of effectiveness of informational booklet.

Table 5: Mean difference (), Standard Error of difference (SEd) and paired ‘t’ values of knowledge scores of subjects.

Knowledge Hypothesis:             H0: d = 0 at 0.05 level of significance

H1: d # 0 at 0.05 level of significance

Mean difference (), Standard Error of difference (SEd) and paired ‘t’ values of knowledge scores of subjects.

Mean difference ()

Standard Error of difference (SEd)

Paired ‘t’ values

Calculated

Tabulated value

12.3

2.98

26.48 *

1.960

 

In pre-test majority of subjects 30 (50%) had an average knowledge; 18 (30%) had poor knowledge and 12 (20%) had good knowledge, where as in post-test 51 (85%) of them had good knowledge and 09 (15%) had poor knowledge. Study also reveals that there is no association between pre-test knowledge and selected Socio demographic variables. Study also reveals that calculated paired ‘t’ value (t= 26.48) is greater than tabulated value (t= 1.960). Hence H1 is accepted. This indicates that the gain in knowledge score is statistically significant at P< 0.05 levels.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1.     The similar study can be repeated on larger scale for better generalizations of the findings.

2.     A similar study can be undertaken by utilizing other domains like attitude and practice.

3.     The study can be conducted in various settings.

4.     A comparative study may be conducted to find out the knowledge of B Sc Nursing students and other health care workers.

5.     An experimental study can be conducted with control group.

6.     A study can be carried out to evaluate the efficacy of various teaching strategies like self-instructional module, video assisted teaching programme.

 

CONCLUSION:

The finding of the study concludes that there is a need for educating the student nurses regarding coronary angiography. It implies that a nursing administrator should take part in developing protocols, standing orders related to design of the educational programmes and strategies for GNM Students regarding Coronary angiography.

 

ETHICAL CLEARANCE:

Obtained from ethical clearance committee of Tulza Bhavani College of nursing

 

FUNDING:

None

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

This is a project conducted by Mr. Azhar H. Shaikh. I thank Mr. Rajshekhar sir, Mrs. Kale, principals of and participants of study.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      “Health Wikipedia” Nov 2016, available on http:// www.google.co.in, retrieved on 20/11/2016.

2.      “Disease” Dec 2016, available on http://www.wikipedia.com, retrieved on 6/12/2016

3.      World health organization “Health” 2016 (online) available on http://www.who.int/topics/health/en/, retrieved on 22/11/2016.

4.      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronary_angiography retrieved on 05/11/2016

5.      World health organization “cardiovascular disease” 2016 available on http://www.searo.who.int/india/topics/cardiovascular_diseases/ en/retrieved on 05/11/2016.

6.      “Cardiovascular disease in India” Dec 2016 available on http:// www.indushealthplus.com/karnataka-health-statistics/,retrieved on 08/12/2016.

7.      Mc Dermott MM, Mondapat AL, CelicL.Knowledge and attitudes regarding cardio vascular disease risk and prevention in patient with coronary or peripheral disease. Northenwestern University. 2003.page No.2157.

8.      “Coronary heart disease” Dec 2016 available on http:// www.scopemed.org/?mno=199633, retrieved on 08/12/2016.

9.      Lloyd joins DM, Larson MG. Lifetime risk of developing coronary artery disease.2000. Page No.89 retrived on 30/12/2016.

10.   Review of literature, pub med, Antianginal medications and long-term outcomes after elective angiography in patients with coronary artery disease 2016 available on https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/28026916, retrieved on 12/12/2016.

11.   Review of literature, Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 5(6): 530-543, retrieved on 03/01/2017.

12.   Review of literature, pub med, early angiography 2016 available on https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037743 retrieved on 10/12/2016.

13.   Review of literature, pub med, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/28242751 retrieved on 10/12/2016.

14.   Review of literature, pub med, Pediatric coronary angiography procedure with dexmedetomidine sedation 2016 available on https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566708 retrieved on 12/12/2016.

15.   Yan, Yu-HuaChen, YiKung, Chih-Ming, Peng, Li-Jung. Continous Quality Improvement of Nursing care: Case study of a clinical pathway revision forcoronary angiography. Journal of Nursing Research.Sept2011; 19(3): 181-89, retrieved on 11/12/2016.

16.   Rolley JX, Salmonson Y, Dennison CR, Davidson PM. Nursing care practices following a percutaneous coronary intervention: results of a survey of Australian and New Zealand Cardiovascular Nurses. J Cardiovasc Nurs. Jan-Feb 2010; 25(1): 75-89 retrieved on 11/12/2016.

17.   Jose A Baz, AgustínAlbarran, Eduardo Pinar, Josepa Mauri coronary angiography: statistics and numerical data.Rev EspCardiol. 2009; 62(12): 1418-34. Retrieved on 14/12/2016.

18.   Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 23. pii: ehw505. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ ehw505. [Epub ahead of print].

19.   Liew R. Verylow complication rate with a manual, nurse-led protocol for sheath removal following coronary angiography. Eur J Cardio vasc Nurs. 2007; 6(4): 303-307.

20.   Herntzen MP, Straure BE. Peripheral arterial complications after coronary angiography. Herz.1998; 23(1): 4-20.

21.   nt J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1; 230: 610-613. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard. 2016.12.046. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

22.   Ramsey BC. et Myocardial Assessment with Cardiac CT: Ischemic Heart Disease and Beyond. 2018; 11(7): 16. doi: 10.1007/s12410-018-9456-2. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

23.   Alfakih K . et al CT coronary angiography: a paradigm shift for functional imaging tests. 2018 Mar 27; 5(1): e000754. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000754. eCollection 2018.

24.   Dash D. et al. Interventional Management of "Balloon-Uncrossable" Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: Is There Any Way Out? 2018; 48(4): 277-286. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0345.

25.   Duda-Pyszny Det al. Coronary artery disease in women. KardiochirTorakochirurgia Pol. 2018 Mar; 15(1): 44-48. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2018.74675. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

26.   Mancio J#1. et al. Perivascular adipose tissue and coronary atherosclerosis. 2018 May 31. pii: heartjnl-2017-312324. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312324.

27.   Cuomo JR1, et al How to prevent and manage radiation-induced coronary artery disease. 2018 May 15. pii: heartjnl-2017-312123. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312123.

28.   Raja SG1, et al. Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis. 2015; 189: 153-8. doi: 10.1016/ j.ijcard.2015.04.059. Epub 2015 Apr 9

 

 

 

Received on 19.06.2021         Modified on 03.07.2021

Accepted on 17.07.2021       ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Int.  J. of Advances in Nur. Management. 2021; 9(4):385-388.

DOI: 10.52711/2454-2652.2021.00089